Methodology
How this report works
The rules we follow so you can trust the numbers — and check them yourself.
Last updated: July 4, 2026Sourcing standards
- Every figure is attributed to its original study, with the publisher, date, and — where available — sample size and population.
- We link to primary sources, not to other sites' coverage of them.
- We date everything. An adoption stat from 2024 is history, not news. Each page shows its last-updated date.
- We never blend figures from different studies into a single invented number.
Reconciliation standards
When credible studies disagree — and in this field they always do — we publish the disagreement rather than cherry-picking. For each conflicting set we identify: the definitionused ("any AI use" vs. "regular use" vs. "embedded in operations"), the population(all businesses, employer firms, customers of the surveying company), and themethod (probability sample vs. opt-in panel). See it in action: the adoption reconciliation.
A note on self-reported ROI
Statistics like "91% of AI users report revenue increases" are self-reported perceptions, not audited outcomes. Businesses that adopt AI also tend to be growing businesses, and respondents attribute gains generously. We publish these figures because they're widely cited — but we label them, and we weight government data more heavily than vendor data.
Update cadence
- Quarterly: full refresh of all statistics pages against the latest releases (Census BTOS, Fed, industry studies).
- As-published: major new studies are incorporated within days of release.
- Annually: our flagship report.
Corrections
Found an error? Tell us and we'll fix it fast, with a note. Independence and accuracy are the entire value of this project.